| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
21. Solution to low-sec mission - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Cyrus Graham on 07/12/2006 21:52:26 I've seen lots of suggestions to move L4 missions to low sec completely, and you know what? It could work, under a couple of conditions: 1) Change L4 missions(hell, maybe all missions) so that th...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.07 21:50:00
|
22. Low-sec pirates - are you happy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I thought maybe you were just asking a general question. 'Hey pirates... are you happy? Do you feel that your lifestyle provides an inner sense of fulfillment?' Something along those lines. ___________________________________ Go play checkers if...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.07 18:29:00
|
23. Mission Runners Strike! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When I saw the topic name, I got a mental image of a bunch of ships flying into low sec and attempting to shield tank the pirates to death. I laughed. ___________________________________ Go play checkers if you want a game where everything's fa...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.07 18:25:00
|
24. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aelfren Blackshadow Although using the current system theres nothing funnier than fitting a couple of stabs grabbing as much aggro as your tank can handle (includling some scramblers) and dragging them to the warp in point. ...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 09:55:00
|
25. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Strength Cow Wrong. Scan probing is a vital part of exploration, which occurs in all security systems. Its also important for war. And other things I'm sure. Turning missions into basically instance areas is not good for th...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 09:41:00
|
26. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: The Enslaver What about those who play just to PVP or play in their chosen method? They also have every right to play as they want, surely! I'm afraid this 'omg I'd quit the game if I couldn't make easy isk anymore' argumen...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 09:29:00
|
27. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Queen Hades But this pvp is expensive and to pay for it I have to grind missions. I also wanted to grind a few missions this week to get me into a HAC finally, but this is off limits now, I don't want to lose my really prec...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 09:18:00
|
28. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Cyrus Graham on 06/12/2006 09:12:35 Originally by: Ishana People screaming about locking missions and making probes in high sec cocordoken offences make me sick! Your emotionally prompted illness doesn't sway me. Rationa...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 09:08:00
|
29. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zwotte Originally by: Cyrus Graham Originally by: Zwotte Originally by: Flaming Lemming Originally by: Zwotte Whats the BS you can't do anything about the high sec griefers. You got a ingame t...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 08:48:00
|
30. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ArchenTheGreat Originally by: Cyrus Graham I remember hearing this mentioned before. Why not make using probes in empire illegal? That keeps lowsec as dangerous as ever, and highsec griefers get Concorded. And it...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 08:29:00
|
31. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zwotte Originally by: Flaming Lemming Originally by: Zwotte Whats the BS you can't do anything about the high sec griefers. You got a ingame tool at your disposal....Wardec them. Problem solved. Because,...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 08:25:00
|
32. ffs ccp, lock griefers out of missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I remember hearing this mentioned before. Why not make using probes in empire illegal? That keeps lowsec as dangerous as ever, and highsec griefers get Concorded. ___________________________________ Go play checkers if you want a game where ever...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 08:14:00
|
33. MMORPG.com Awards: Time for the finals! (make sure to vote again!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
With a few exceptions, the only fun I had in WoW PvE was due to my being a roleplayer. The quests helped to expand lore(curse you, Blizzard, for breaking Warcraft lore so horribly to "balance" the game), but other than that they were tedious in th...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.06 05:40:00
|
34. how long untill the next gen graphics engine update (vista) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: DefJam101 Wait a sec, I'm a GFX n00b, your saying running my PC in SLI doesn't help in EVE? WTF? lol And what about my dual core processor? Eve is older than SLI, and older than consumer dual core. So make your own ass...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 17:20:00
|
35. Tonight's Official Server Problem Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Phoenix Lonestar The stress tests that occurred at 2 or 3am for some of us? Hey, the lady said that only results count. ___________________________________ Go play checkers if you want a game where everything's fair an...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 06:04:00
|
36. Should High Sec Space Be Extended Rather Than Extending 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CERBERUS III with these areas out in 0.0 how many people will get to use them?? As many that want to. ___________________________________ Go play checkers if you want a game where everything's fair and equal.
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 05:34:00
|
37. Tonight's Official Server Problem Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell Results, not intentions, count. The results are speaking for themselves. Results, eh? Funny thing about QA is that the results are not evident. Because the results are that things get fixed, which you dont se...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 05:31:00
|
38. Salvaging - PvP vs PvE ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Caedicus You never answered my question. Why would anyone PVP if it yielded them less reward? Because it's fun? So you think they should be forced to do something boring in order to have that fun? Read my post. Pv...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 03:21:00
|
39. Salvaging - PvP vs PvE ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In all honesty, I think that the act of destroying another player's ship isn't what makes PvP profitable in Eve. What makes PvP profitable(or rather, what CAN make PVP profitable) is what the killing accomplishes outside of the wreckage you loot a...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.04 01:36:00
|
40. ok, so can we get GM conformation on this once and for all - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I agree that it is more immersive to have wrecks. And as has been pointed out, if there is a wreck then there should be something there, either in loot, or salvage. Scrap metal would make sense, though I don't think it would be a very good fix(l...
- by Cyrus Graham - at 2006.12.01 22:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |